In knowing how life has become difficult from various ways in which some game the system better or more than others, I decided to think deeply about how the stock market system could be made so it could not be gamed, at least not anything like how it is able to be done presently. The thought came to me in a flash: instead of having a constant number of shares and the price per share is allowed to vary, in flipping these to having the number of shares vary and the price per share constant, the gaming, or specifically, manipulation would be greatly diminished.
Janet Yellen’s desire to have government buy up the stock market in order to widen the wealth divide and cause greater harm both to society and the economy would be quashed. For in this system there would be a sense of saturation wherein more money going in would result in diminished returns. In wanting to utilize limitless money to destroy humanity would thus be ineffective. Consider the following scenario and without regard to any stock market system: You require $5M to get a business running. But you discover your uncle is Elon Musk and he hands $5B to you. Let’s say you get your company running and you are able to turn a profit, utilizing just the $5M you needed. Well, whatever returns that are being would be infinitesimal relative to the overall $5B as much of it would not be utilized. As you can see here, this would be an over-saturation. Now, in the present system, $100M could prop up a stock to having a total net value of $5B as it requires only more willingness to buy than to sell. However, this is counter-intuitive as if only $100M were invested, how could one attribute a $5B valuation? You see, this is part of the game of the senseless system at present. In this newer system I am proposing, $100M invested means exactly that, $100M is in and that’s the current worth, not counting dividends, and until perhaps it gets bought out. No big funny money creation in this newer system also means no big funny money loss which adds to overall stability in the economy, in addition to curbing the wealth divide.
In this new system there would be no need for short selling nor would it be useful like in the present system where people defy a sense of rational valuations and otherwise stocks being manipulated up egregiously as what has been going on since 2009 by the Federal Reserve. When stock prices are wildly overpriced it compels investors to short sell. Now, in this particular system I developed the share price would remain constant, or nearly so. All bid prices, that is, the price investors would pay for shares would be $10. The bid price would be determined by the corporation, not anyone else. A tighter bid close to $10 might suggest the company is stable and willing to allow much freedom in buying and selling, but not to make money in trading, simply to be able to pull out with ease and with little loss. Such a corporation, in my opinion, may be so well situated that it no longer really needs investor money. As put forth in my book, "Thoughtful Living", I believe there should be some metrics applied to corporations doing fine without requiring investor money to expand, to force them to become private. These corporations basically exist to take advantage of population increase, regressive government and central bank policies, and which means much more goes to executives. No doubt, if privatized, corporate executives would not be able to "earn" as much money off most everyone else. had the stated profits were for real and from basic understanding of human greed, some person or group of persons would have long bought out the corporation but as this doesn't ordinarily happen, it points to the stated profit is not as true as claimed in addition to something I posted in an article at seekingalpha.com (look up "Investors do not get all the "E" in the "PE"") which elaborates the point that there is a stated "earnings" but those earnings do not go entirely to shareholders. Investors are mostly led astray in thinking they may be paying per some reasonable PE ratio but the effective PE ratio may be 20, 50, or even more percent LESS, thus demonstrating how much overpriced the stock market is from sham accounting and of how "investors" are paying too much.
In this new system stock streamers would need to have little information: a stock ticker symbol, the bid price, the ask price is always $10 per share so there is no need to show this, the trailing rate of return on an annualized basis (TROR), the trailing number of shares on record per the most recent dividend pay-out (TSOR), and the current number of shares on record (CSOR). What would typically change with typically little change would be the CSOR.
There would be no need to steer at stock prices for 6.5 hours in the regular trading session, no need to drearily watch the market for 13 hours of daily trading commonly available including extended hours trading in order to hope for some price in your favor. Although these hours are extensive, this new system, in it's simplicity and no longer massive trading as goes on in the present system, trading could be allowed 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and including holidays.
There'd be no worry of missing out on sudden stock surges as there would be none, except in the case a corporation is bought out and then all shareholders on record would receive some premium above the $10 stock price, in many situations, but perhaps a few such as a biotech or any corporation for that matters has not earned a profit yet and has a bid perhaps at $7, the premium would conceivably be based on the $7 share price so it's possible a buyout price may not exceed $10 per share. This is the risk investors take. ever since 2009, the federal Reserve has been actively engaging in the most incredible wealth transference in history by coddling "investors" who on the most part are the wealthiest in society and for the most part, never having to lose any money even upon making stupid financial decisions. The Federal Reserve is at their back and the thought of risk related to RISK ASSETS has been long forgotten.
With stock prices stagnant it would be far more entertaining watching paint dry. This provides much security, and less stress as there’s be little worry about significant volatility apart from predominant corporation specific issues.
In addition, there'd be no need for [dubious] technical analysis (looking at graphs to dream of knowing what the future price might be) though there may be some superficial analysis of seeing the past rates of returns that anyone could inspect and understand.
The use of stock options, another game involved in the present system, could go away.
In this manipulation resistant stock market system, the basis would be investing, not gaming the system via manipulation that major players have always been allowed to do and highlighted just recently in January 2021 where a gang of small-time investors get together and manipulate stocks. The manipulation should have been dealt with a long time ago but being the wealthy gained there was no reason for politicians to do anything about it. When the little guy is able to outplay the wealthy then of course there will be cries of foul play. Expect band-aid non-solutions as politicians are famous for. However, if you want a real change addressing the fundamental principles of the stock market, you could help get this system implemented.
An important aspect of this manipulation-resistant stock market system is the system involving the stock market would become much simpler, more direct, and with gaming of the system pretty much absent, we'd be improving efficiency by ridding of many thousands of non-productive jobs. We have so many money-pushers in society and it drains the economy. Those multi-million dollar stock market monkey positions in wall Street could mostly go away. Society on the whole would be improved.
I tried pushing this system onto the SEC back in 2010 but as you know, who goes in government are not the brightest. Funny hearing members of Congress moaning about the manipulation being done by a bunch of small-time investors and didn’t mind at all the Federal Reserve manipulating up the market for the prior eleven years and still hasn’t let up. One such person doing this moaning, I contacted numerous times alerting her of the manipulation being done by the Federal Reserve and she never replied back.
Enough is enough! Let there be a fair playing field for the stock market!
Janet Yellen’s desire to have government buy up the stock market in order to widen the wealth divide and cause greater harm both to society and the economy would be quashed. For in this system there would be a sense of saturation wherein more money going in would result in diminished returns. In wanting to utilize limitless money to destroy humanity would thus be ineffective. Consider the following scenario and without regard to any stock market system: You require $5M to get a business running. But you discover your uncle is Elon Musk and he hands $5B to you. Let’s say you get your company running and you are able to turn a profit, utilizing just the $5M you needed. Well, whatever returns that are being would be infinitesimal relative to the overall $5B as much of it would not be utilized. As you can see here, this would be an over-saturation. Now, in the present system, $100M could prop up a stock to having a total net value of $5B as it requires only more willingness to buy than to sell. However, this is counter-intuitive as if only $100M were invested, how could one attribute a $5B valuation? You see, this is part of the game of the senseless system at present. In this newer system I am proposing, $100M invested means exactly that, $100M is in and that’s the current worth, not counting dividends, and until perhaps it gets bought out. No big funny money creation in this newer system also means no big funny money loss which adds to overall stability in the economy, in addition to curbing the wealth divide.
In this new system there would be no need for short selling nor would it be useful like in the present system where people defy a sense of rational valuations and otherwise stocks being manipulated up egregiously as what has been going on since 2009 by the Federal Reserve. When stock prices are wildly overpriced it compels investors to short sell. Now, in this particular system I developed the share price would remain constant, or nearly so. All bid prices, that is, the price investors would pay for shares would be $10. The bid price would be determined by the corporation, not anyone else. A tighter bid close to $10 might suggest the company is stable and willing to allow much freedom in buying and selling, but not to make money in trading, simply to be able to pull out with ease and with little loss. Such a corporation, in my opinion, may be so well situated that it no longer really needs investor money. As put forth in my book, "Thoughtful Living", I believe there should be some metrics applied to corporations doing fine without requiring investor money to expand, to force them to become private. These corporations basically exist to take advantage of population increase, regressive government and central bank policies, and which means much more goes to executives. No doubt, if privatized, corporate executives would not be able to "earn" as much money off most everyone else. had the stated profits were for real and from basic understanding of human greed, some person or group of persons would have long bought out the corporation but as this doesn't ordinarily happen, it points to the stated profit is not as true as claimed in addition to something I posted in an article at seekingalpha.com (look up "Investors do not get all the "E" in the "PE"") which elaborates the point that there is a stated "earnings" but those earnings do not go entirely to shareholders. Investors are mostly led astray in thinking they may be paying per some reasonable PE ratio but the effective PE ratio may be 20, 50, or even more percent LESS, thus demonstrating how much overpriced the stock market is from sham accounting and of how "investors" are paying too much.
In this new system stock streamers would need to have little information: a stock ticker symbol, the bid price, the ask price is always $10 per share so there is no need to show this, the trailing rate of return on an annualized basis (TROR), the trailing number of shares on record per the most recent dividend pay-out (TSOR), and the current number of shares on record (CSOR). What would typically change with typically little change would be the CSOR.
There would be no need to steer at stock prices for 6.5 hours in the regular trading session, no need to drearily watch the market for 13 hours of daily trading commonly available including extended hours trading in order to hope for some price in your favor. Although these hours are extensive, this new system, in it's simplicity and no longer massive trading as goes on in the present system, trading could be allowed 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and including holidays.
There'd be no worry of missing out on sudden stock surges as there would be none, except in the case a corporation is bought out and then all shareholders on record would receive some premium above the $10 stock price, in many situations, but perhaps a few such as a biotech or any corporation for that matters has not earned a profit yet and has a bid perhaps at $7, the premium would conceivably be based on the $7 share price so it's possible a buyout price may not exceed $10 per share. This is the risk investors take. ever since 2009, the federal Reserve has been actively engaging in the most incredible wealth transference in history by coddling "investors" who on the most part are the wealthiest in society and for the most part, never having to lose any money even upon making stupid financial decisions. The Federal Reserve is at their back and the thought of risk related to RISK ASSETS has been long forgotten.
With stock prices stagnant it would be far more entertaining watching paint dry. This provides much security, and less stress as there’s be little worry about significant volatility apart from predominant corporation specific issues.
In addition, there'd be no need for [dubious] technical analysis (looking at graphs to dream of knowing what the future price might be) though there may be some superficial analysis of seeing the past rates of returns that anyone could inspect and understand.
The use of stock options, another game involved in the present system, could go away.
In this manipulation resistant stock market system, the basis would be investing, not gaming the system via manipulation that major players have always been allowed to do and highlighted just recently in January 2021 where a gang of small-time investors get together and manipulate stocks. The manipulation should have been dealt with a long time ago but being the wealthy gained there was no reason for politicians to do anything about it. When the little guy is able to outplay the wealthy then of course there will be cries of foul play. Expect band-aid non-solutions as politicians are famous for. However, if you want a real change addressing the fundamental principles of the stock market, you could help get this system implemented.
An important aspect of this manipulation-resistant stock market system is the system involving the stock market would become much simpler, more direct, and with gaming of the system pretty much absent, we'd be improving efficiency by ridding of many thousands of non-productive jobs. We have so many money-pushers in society and it drains the economy. Those multi-million dollar stock market monkey positions in wall Street could mostly go away. Society on the whole would be improved.
I tried pushing this system onto the SEC back in 2010 but as you know, who goes in government are not the brightest. Funny hearing members of Congress moaning about the manipulation being done by a bunch of small-time investors and didn’t mind at all the Federal Reserve manipulating up the market for the prior eleven years and still hasn’t let up. One such person doing this moaning, I contacted numerous times alerting her of the manipulation being done by the Federal Reserve and she never replied back.
Enough is enough! Let there be a fair playing field for the stock market!
Third-Party Timestamp Verification (by Grok, xAI): October 26, 2025, 01:17:00 PDT
Completion Date: October 26, 2025
This confirms THOMAS BLANKENHORN OF CORRUPT GRANTS PASS OREGON formalized and disclosed the Novel Stock Market System on October 26, 2025, from Grants Pass, Oregon, to secure prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102.
NOVEL STOCK MARKET SYSTEM
A Proprietary Revolution in Financial Systems by THOMAS BLANKENHORN OF CORRUPT GRANTS PASS OREGON
I Discovery Statement
GOD BREATHED THE NOVEL STOCK MARKET SYSTEM, a new system for stock trading, disclosed on October 26, 2025 by THOMAS BLANKENHORN OF CORRUPT GRANTS PASS OREGON from Corrupt Grants Pass Oregon.
NOVEL STOCK MARKET SYSTEM • Prior Art Record • THOMAS BLANKENHORN OF CORRUPT GRANTS PASS OREGON
Original Disclosure: October 26, 2025, Grants Pass, Oregon
Comments
Post a Comment